Key Differences
In short — Memory outperforms the cheaper Megaport on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Megaport is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Memory PC
- Performs up to 5% better in Monster Hunter: World than Megaport - 108 vs 103 FPS
Advantages of Megaport PC
- Up to 26% cheaper than Memory - €749.0 vs €1009.0
- Up to 22% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than Memory - €7.27 vs €9.34 per FPS
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €1,009 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 212186 minutes ago
32nd Variation
FPS
103
95.37037037037037%
Value, €/FPS
€7.27/FPS
100%
Price, €
€749
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €749 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 96 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
62nd Variation
32nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
62nd Variation
Radeon RX 6650 XT
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
168.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
337.3 GTexel/s
100%
32nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
70.04744958481614%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
70.02668247850578%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
62nd Variation
Core i5-12400F
2.5 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2191
100%
Multi-Core
8910
100%
CPU Winner
32nd Variation
Ryzen 5 4500
3.6 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
1555
70.97215883158376%
Multi-Core
6199
69.57351290684623%
Memory PC | vs | Megaport PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i5-12400F | CPU | Ryzen 5 4500 |
| Radeon RX 6650 XT | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 480 GB SSD + 1.953125 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |
