Key Differences
In short — EMCA4 outperforms Memory on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Performs up to 112% better in Dead Space than Memory - 142 vs 67 FPS
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Currently N/A on Amazon
Out of Stock
Updated 150 minutes ago
47th Variation
FPS
142
100%
Value, €/FPS
€17.32/FPS
100%
Price, €
€2459
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €2,459 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 147 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
6th Variation
47th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
6th Variation
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
8 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
133.2 GPixel/s
47%
Texel Fillrate
253.1 GTexel/s
31%
47th Variation
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
285.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
816 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
47th Variation
Core i9-14900K
3.2 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
3101
100%
Multi-Core
21000
100%
CPU Winner
Memory PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-10700 | CPU | Core i9-14900K |
| GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | GPU | GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 240 GB SSD + 1.953125 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |
