Key Differences
In short — EMCA4 outperforms the cheaper Memory on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Memory is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Memory PC
- Up to 53% cheaper than EMCA4 - €1069.00 vs €2279.00
- Up to 14% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than EMCA4 - €9.90 vs €11.51 per FPS
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Performs up to 83% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Memory - 198 vs 108 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €1,069 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 230 minutes ago
Buy for €2,279 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 228 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
28th Variation
45th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
28th Variation
Radeon RX 6750 XT
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
166.4 GPixel/s
35%
Texel Fillrate
416 GTexel/s
43%
45th Variation
Radeon RX 7900 XTX
24 GB GDDR6 | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
479.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
959.6 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
45th Variation
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
4.2 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2719
100%
Multi-Core
15172
100%
CPU Winner
Memory PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Ryzen 7 5700X | CPU | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
Radeon RX 6750 XT | GPU | Radeon RX 7900 XTX |
16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
240 GB SSD + 1 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |