Key Differences
In short — Memory outperforms the cheaper Megaport on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Megaport is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Memory PC
- Performs up to 10% better in No Man's Sky than Megaport - 116 vs 105 FPS
Advantages of Megaport PC
- Up to 23% cheaper than Memory - €749.0 vs €979.0
- Up to 16% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Memory - €7.13 vs €8.44 per FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €979 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1210 minutes ago
32nd Variation
FPS
105
90.51724137931035%
Value, €/FPS
€7.13/FPS
100%
Price, €
€749
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €749 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1209 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
54th Variation
32nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
54th Variation
Radeon RX 6650 XT
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
168.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
337.3 GTexel/s
100%
32nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
70.04744958481614%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
70.02668247850578%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
54th Variation
Core i5-12400F
2.5 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2191
100%
Multi-Core
8910
100%
CPU Winner
32nd Variation
Ryzen 5 4500
3.6 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
1555
70.97215883158376%
Multi-Core
6199
69.57351290684623%
Memory PC | vs | Megaport PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i5-12400F | CPU | Ryzen 5 4500 |
| Radeon RX 6650 XT | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 240 GB SSD + 1 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |
