Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Memory outperforms the cheaper PC fisso on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Memory PC
- Performs up to 28% better in Counter-Strike 2 than PC fisso - 247 vs 193 FPS
- Up to 20% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than PC fisso - €3.36 vs €4.2 per FPS
Advantages of PC fisso Computer PC
- Up to 2% cheaper than Memory - €810.4 vs €829.0
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €829 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2242 minutes ago
Buy for €810.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2239 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
52nd Variation
5th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
52nd Variation
Radeon RX 6650 XT
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
168.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
337.3 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
5th Variation
GeForce RTX 3060
12 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
85.3 GPixel/s
50.59311981020166%
Texel Fillrate
199 GTexel/s
58.99792469611621%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
5th Variation
Ryzen 5 4500
null-core
Single-Core
1555
83.11063602351683%
Multi-Core
6199
80.59022360894436%
Memory PC | vs | PC fisso Computer PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Ryzen 5 5500 | CPU | Ryzen 5 4500 |
Radeon RX 6650 XT | GPU | GeForce RTX 3060 |
16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
240 GB SSD + 1 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |