Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — EMCA4 outperforms Memory on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Performs up to 33% better in Starfield than Memory - 24 vs 18 FPS
- Up to 25% better value when playing Starfield than Memory - €34.54 vs €46.06 per FPS
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €829 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74209 minutes ago
22nd Variation
FPS
24
100%
Value, €/FPS
€34.54/FPS
100%
Price, €
€829
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €829 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74209 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
52nd Variation
22nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
52nd Variation
Radeon RX 6650 XT
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
168.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
337.3 GTexel/s
100%
22nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
70.04744958481614%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
70.02668247850578%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
52nd Variation
Ryzen 5 5500
3.6 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
1871
89.43594646271511%
Multi-Core
7692
88.83242868691535%
22nd Variation
Ryzen 5 5600X
3.7 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2092
100%
Multi-Core
8659
100%
CPU Winner
Memory PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 5 5500 | CPU | Ryzen 5 5600X |
| Radeon RX 6650 XT | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 240 GB SSD + 1 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |
