Key Differences
In short — Memory outperforms the cheaper Megaport on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Megaport is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Memory PC
- Performs up to 12% better in Minecraft than Megaport - 716 vs 637 FPS
Advantages of Megaport PC
- Up to 15% cheaper than Memory - €1249.0 vs €1469.0
- Up to 4% better value when playing Minecraft than Memory - €1.96 vs €2.05 per FPS
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €1,469 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65993 minutes ago
47th Variation
FPS
637
88.96648044692738%
Value, €/FPS
€1.96/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1249
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €1,249 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65982 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
49th Variation
47th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
49th Variation
Radeon RX 6950 XT
16 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
295.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
739.2 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
47th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
39.93912749408184%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
31.9534632034632%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
49th Variation
Ryzen 5 5600X
3.7 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2092
82.81868566904195%
Multi-Core
8659
63.90877555539154%
47th Variation
Core i7-12700KF
3.6 GHz | 12-core
Single-Core
2526
100%
Multi-Core
13549
100%
CPU Winner
Memory PC | vs | Megaport PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Ryzen 5 5600X | CPU | Core i7-12700KF |
Radeon RX 6950 XT | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
480 GB SSD + 1 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |