Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Memory outperforms the more expensive EMCA4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Memory PC
- Performs up to 8% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than EMCA4 - 140 vs 130 FPS
- Up to 2% cheaper than EMCA4 - €1469.0 vs €1499.0
- Up to 9% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than EMCA4 - €10.49 vs €11.53 per FPS
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €1,469 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 530 minutes ago
Buy for €1,499 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 528 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
49th Variation
55th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
49th Variation
Radeon RX 6950 XT
16 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
295.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
739.2 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
55th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
54%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
62%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
55th Variation
Core i5-14600KF
null-core
Single-Core
2769
100%
Multi-Core
15636
100%
CPU Winner
Memory PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 5 5600X | CPU | Core i5-14600KF |
| Radeon RX 6950 XT | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 480 GB SSD + 1 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |