Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — PCSpecialist Prism outperforms Memory on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of PCSpecialist Prism PC
- Performs up to 27% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Memory - 81 vs 64 FPS
- Up to 21% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Memory - €11.72 vs €14.83 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €949 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 262 minutes ago
5th Variation
FPS
81
100%
Value, €/FPS
€11.72/FPS
100%
Price, €
€949
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €949 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 259 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
41st Variation
5th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
41st Variation
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
6 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
99%
Texel Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
85%
5th Variation
GeForce RTX 3060
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
85.3 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
199 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
5th Variation
Core i5-12400F
2.5 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2191
100%
Multi-Core
8910
86%
CPU Winner
Memory PC | vs | PCSpecialist Prism PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 7 5800X | CPU | Core i5-12400F |
| GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | GPU | GeForce RTX 3060 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 480 GB SSD + 1.953125 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |
