Key Differences
In short — EMCA4 outperforms Memory on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Performs up to 41% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Memory - 120 vs 85 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Currently N/A on Amazon
Out of Stock
Updated 53 minutes ago
Currently N/A on Amazon
Out of Stock
Updated 51 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
4th Variation
50th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
4th Variation
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
8 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
133.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
253.1 GTexel/s
73%
50th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
16 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
91%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
50th Variation
Core i7-13700F
2.1 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2661
100%
Multi-Core
15475
100%
CPU Winner
Memory PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 5 3600 | CPU | Core i7-13700F |
| GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 240 GB SSD + 1.953125 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |
