Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Megaport outperforms the more expensive Memory on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Megaport PC
- Performs up to 11% better in Monster Hunter: World than Memory - 180 vs 162 FPS
- Up to 11% cheaper than Memory - €1699.0 vs €1919.0
- Up to 20% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than Memory - €9.44 vs €11.85 per FPS
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €1,919 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 206657 minutes ago
Buy for €1,699 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75072 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
38th Variation
27th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
38th Variation
GeForce RTX 3080
10 GB GDDR6X | 320-bit
Pixel Fillrate
164.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
465.1 GTexel/s
100%
27th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
96.46772228989039%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
97.91442700494515%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
38th Variation
Core i9-11900
2.5 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2130
73.24621733149931%
Multi-Core
8816
57.76059752342265%
27th Variation
Ryzen 7 7700X
4.5 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2908
100%
Multi-Core
15263
100%
CPU Winner
Memory PC | vs | Megaport PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-11900 | CPU | Ryzen 7 7700X |
| GeForce RTX 3080 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 480 GB SSD + 1.953125 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |
