Key Differences
In short — Megaport outperforms Memory on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Performs up to 22% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Memory - 351 vs 287 FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Memory PC
283rd Variation
Megaport Gaming PC
31st Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Memory PC
283rd Variation
Radeon RX 6400
4 GB GDDR6 | 64-bit
Pixel Fillrate
74.27 GPixel/s
47%
Texel Fillrate
111.4 GTexel/s
24%
GPU Winner
Megaport Gaming PC
31st Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Memory PC
283rd Variation
Core i7-12700K
3.6 GHz | 12-core
Single-Core
2531
100%
Multi-Core
13694
100%
CPU Winner
Memory PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-12700K | CPU | Ryzen 9 5900X |
| Radeon RX 6400 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
