Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Memory outperforms the cheaper Megaport on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Memory PC
- Performs up to 47% better in No Man's Sky than Megaport - 173 vs 118 FPS
- Up to 8% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Megaport - €8.61 vs €9.31 per FPS
Advantages of Megaport PC
- Up to 26% cheaper than Memory - €1099.0 vs €1489.0
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €1,489 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4554 minutes ago
Buy for €1,099 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4544 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
34th Variation
37th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
34th Variation
Radeon RX 6950 XT
16 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
295.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
739.2 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
37th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
39%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
31%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
34th Variation
Ryzen 7 5700X
3.4 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2121
100%
Multi-Core
9729
100%
CPU Winner
Memory PC | vs | Megaport PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 7 5700X | CPU | Core i7-11700F |
| Radeon RX 6950 XT | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 480 GB SSD + 1 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |
