Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — EMCA4 outperforms the cheaper Memory on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Memory PC
- Up to 16% cheaper than EMCA4 - €1489.00 vs €1769.00
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Performs up to 38% better in Starfield than Memory - 66 vs 48 FPS
- Up to 14% better value when playing Starfield than Memory - €26.80 vs €31.02 per FPS
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €1,489 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280 minutes ago
51st Variation
FPS
66
100%
Value, €/FPS
€26.8/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1769
84%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,769 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 278 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
34th Variation
51st Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
34th Variation
Radeon RX 6950 XT
16 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
295.7 GPixel/s
64%
Texel Fillrate
739.2 GTexel/s
92%
51st Variation
Radeon RX 7900 XT
20 GB GDDR6 | 320-bit
Pixel Fillrate
459.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
804.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
51st Variation
Core i5-13600K
3.5 GHz | 14-core
Single-Core
2665
100%
Multi-Core
14848
100%
CPU Winner
Memory PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 7 5700X | CPU | Core i5-13600K |
| Radeon RX 6950 XT | GPU | Radeon RX 7900 XT |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 480 GB SSD + 1 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |
