Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Memory outperforms the cheaper EMCA4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Memory PC
- Performs up to 55% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than EMCA4 - 102 vs 66 FPS
- Up to 1% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than EMCA4 - €14.6 vs €14.68 per FPS
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Up to 35% cheaper than Memory - €969.0 vs €1489.0
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €1,489 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 232 minutes ago
38th Variation
FPS
66
64.70588235294117%
Value, €/FPS
€14.68/FPS
99.45504087193461%
Price, €
€969
100%
Buy for €969 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 985 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
34th Variation
38th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
34th Variation
Radeon RX 6950 XT
16 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
295.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
739.2 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
38th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
16 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
41.15657761244505%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
46.64502164502164%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
38th Variation
Ryzen 5 5600X
3.7 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2092
98.63272041489863%
Multi-Core
8659
89.00195292424709%
Memory PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 7 5700X | CPU | Ryzen 5 5600X |
| Radeon RX 6950 XT | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 480 GB SSD + 1 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |
