Key Differences
In short — Memory outperforms the cheaper EMCA4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing EMCA4 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Memory PC
- Performs up to 37% better in Starfield than EMCA4 - 48 vs 35 FPS
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Up to 33% cheaper than Memory - €999.0 vs €1489.0
- Up to 8% better value when playing Starfield than Memory - €28.54 vs €31.02 per FPS
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €1,489 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4543 minutes ago
Buy for €999 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4540 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
34th Variation
12th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
34th Variation
Radeon RX 6950 XT
16 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
295.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
739.2 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
12th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
39%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
31%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
12th Variation
Ryzen 5 7600
3.8 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2735
100%
Multi-Core
12259
100%
CPU Winner
Memory PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 7 5700X | CPU | Ryzen 5 7600 |
| Radeon RX 6950 XT | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 480 GB SSD + 1 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |
