Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Memory outperforms the cheaper Next Spike 27, on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Memory PC
- Performs up to 167% better in Immortals of Aveum than Next Spike 27, - 40 vs 15 FPS
- Up to 50% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Next Spike 27, - €35.98 vs €72.60 per FPS
Advantages of Next Spike 27, PC
- Up to 24% cheaper than Memory - €1089.00 vs €1439.00
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €1,439 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1640 minutes ago
Buy for €1,089 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1636 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
33rd Variation
Jun 1st, 2024
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
33rd Variation
Radeon RX 6950 XT
16 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
295.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
739.2 GTexel/s
100%
Jun 1st, 2024
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
40%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
32%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Jun 1st, 2024
Core i5-12400F
2.5 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2191
100%
Multi-Core
8910
92%
CPU Winner
Memory PC | vs | Next Spike 27, PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2024 |
| Ryzen 7 5700X | CPU | Core i5-12400F |
| Radeon RX 6950 XT | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 240 GB SSD + 1 TB HDD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
