Key Differences
In short — EMCA4 outperforms Memory on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Performs up to 35% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Memory - 101 vs 75 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
14th Variation
FPS
101
100%
Value, €/FPS
€8.50/FPS
100%
Price, €
€859
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €859 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 344 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
254th Variation
14th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
254th Variation
Radeon RX 6600
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
159.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
279 GTexel/s
81%
GPU Winner
14th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
76%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
254th Variation
Ryzen 7 5800X
3.8 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2197
100%
Multi-Core
10224
100%
CPU Winner
Memory PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 7 5800X | CPU | Ryzen 5 5500 |
| Radeon RX 6600 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 480 GB SSD + 2 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |
