Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — EMCA4 outperforms the more expensive Memory on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Performs up to 16% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Memory - 318 vs 275 FPS
- Up to 1% cheaper than Memory - €939.00 vs €949.00
- Up to 14% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Memory - €2.95 vs €3.45 per FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €949 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 586 minutes ago
6th Variation
FPS
318
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.95/FPS
100%
Price, €
€939
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €939 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 586 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
30th Variation
6th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
30th Variation
Radeon RX 6750 XT
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
166.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
416 GTexel/s
100%
6th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
73%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
83%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
6th Variation
Ryzen 7 5800X
3.8 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2178
100%
Multi-Core
10263
100%
CPU Winner
Memory PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 5 5500 | CPU | Ryzen 7 5800X |
| Radeon RX 6750 XT | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 240 GB SSD + 1 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |
