Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — EMCA4 outperforms the cheaper Memory on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Memory PC
- Up to 28% cheaper than EMCA4 - €1049.00 vs €1449.00
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Performs up to 57% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Memory - 387 vs 247 FPS
- Up to 12% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Memory - €3.74 vs €4.25 per FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €1,049 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 309621 minutes ago
50th Variation
FPS
387
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.74/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1449
72%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,449 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5755 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
13th Variation
50th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
13th Variation
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
8 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
169.9 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
339.8 GTexel/s
99%
50th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
16 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
72%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
50th Variation
Core i7-13700F
2.1 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2661
100%
Multi-Core
15475
100%
CPU Winner
Memory PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 5 3600 | CPU | Core i7-13700F |
| GeForce RTX 3070 Ti | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 240 GB SSD + 1.953125 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |
