Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — EMCA4 outperforms the more expensive Memory on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Performs up to 6% better in Dead Space than Memory - 76 vs 72 FPS
- Up to 17% cheaper than Memory - €899.0 vs €1089.0
- Up to 22% better value when playing Dead Space than Memory - €11.83 vs €15.12 per FPS
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €1,089 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 195 minutes ago
14th Variation
FPS
76
100%
Value, €/FPS
€11.83/FPS
100%
Price, €
€899
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €899 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 193 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
24th Variation
14th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
24th Variation
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
8 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
133.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
253.1 GTexel/s
73%
14th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
91%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
24th Variation
Ryzen 5 5600X
3.7 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2092
100%
Multi-Core
8659
100%
CPU Winner
Memory PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 5 5600X | CPU | Ryzen 5 5500 |
| GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 240 GB SSD + 1.953125 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |
