Key Differences
In short — EMCA4 outperforms the cheaper Memory on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Memory is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Memory PC
- Up to 45% cheaper than EMCA4 - €829.00 vs €1499.00
- Up to 11% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than EMCA4 - €9.64 vs €10.78 per FPS
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Performs up to 62% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Memory - 139 vs 86 FPS
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €829 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 471 minutes ago
Buy for €1,499 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 470 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
52nd Variation
55th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
52nd Variation
Radeon RX 6650 XT
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
168.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
337.3 GTexel/s
74%
55th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
94%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
55th Variation
Core i5-14600KF
3.5 GHz | 14-core
Single-Core
2769
100%
Multi-Core
15636
100%
CPU Winner
Memory PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 5 5500 | CPU | Core i5-14600KF |
| Radeon RX 6650 XT | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 240 GB SSD + 1 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |
