Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Pc outperforms the more expensive Memory on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Pc Gaming Computer PC
- Performs up to 4% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Memory - 121 vs 116 FPS
- Up to 26% cheaper than Memory - €1248.0 vs €1689.0
- Up to 29% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Memory - €10.31 vs €14.56 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
1st Variation
FPS
116
95.86776859504133%
Value, €/FPS
€14.56/FPS
70.81043956043956%
Price, €
€1689
73%
Buy for €1,689 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2683 minutes ago
2nd Variation
FPS
121
100%
Value, €/FPS
€10.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1248
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,248 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2682 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
1st Variation
2nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
1st Variation
Radeon RX 6750 XT
12 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
166.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
416 GTexel/s
100%
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
16 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
73.13701923076923%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
82.88461538461539%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
1st Variation
Core i9-12900
null-core
Single-Core
2473
92.79549718574108%
Multi-Core
13044
87.85021551724138%
2nd Variation
Core i5-13600K
null-core
Single-Core
2665
100%
Multi-Core
14848
100%
CPU Winner
Memory Gaming PC | vs | Pc Gaming Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-12900 | CPU | Core i5-13600K |
| Radeon RX 6750 XT | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 480 GB SSD + 1000 GB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |
