Key Differences
In short — Memory outperforms the cheaper EMCA4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing EMCA4 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Memory Gaming PC
- Performs up to 30% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than EMCA4 - 116 vs 89 FPS
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Up to 56% cheaper than Memory - €749.0 vs €1689.0
- Up to 42% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Memory - €8.42 vs €14.56 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
1st Variation
FPS
116
100%
Value, €/FPS
€14.56/FPS
57.82967032967032%
Price, €
€1689
44%
FPS Winner
Buy for €1,689 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76801 minutes ago
7th Variation
FPS
89
76.72413793103449%
Value, €/FPS
€8.42/FPS
100%
Price, €
€749
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €749 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76800 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
1st Variation
7th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
1st Variation
Radeon RX 6750 XT
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
166.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
416 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
7th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
70.9735576923077%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
56.77884615384615%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
1st Variation
Core i9-12900
2.4 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2473
100%
Multi-Core
13044
100%
CPU Winner
7th Variation
Ryzen 5 5600
3.5 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2029
82.04609785685403%
Multi-Core
8539
65.46304814474088%
Memory Gaming PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-12900 | CPU | Ryzen 5 5600 |
| Radeon RX 6750 XT | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 480 GB SSD + 1000 GB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |
