Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — EMCA4 outperforms the more expensive Memory on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Performs up to 11% better in Battlefield 1 than Memory - 196 vs 176 FPS
- Up to 41% cheaper than Memory - €999.0 vs €1689.0
- Up to 47% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Memory - €5.1 vs €9.6 per FPS
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €1,689 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 200 minutes ago
40th Variation
FPS
196
100%
Value, €/FPS
€5.1/FPS
100%
Price, €
€999
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €999 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 197 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
1st Variation
40th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
1st Variation
Radeon RX 6750 XT
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
166.4 GPixel/s
68.14086814086815%
Texel Fillrate
416 GTexel/s
75.70518653321201%
40th Variation
Radeon RX 7700 XT
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
244.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
549.5 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
1st Variation
Core i9-12900
2.4 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2473
100%
Multi-Core
13044
100%
CPU Winner
40th Variation
Ryzen 7 5700X
3.4 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2121
85.7662757784068%
Multi-Core
9729
74.58601655933764%
Memory Gaming PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-12900 | CPU | Ryzen 7 5700X |
| Radeon RX 6750 XT | GPU | Radeon RX 7700 XT |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 480 GB SSD + 1000 GB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |
