Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Megaport outperforms the more expensive Memory on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Megaport PC
- Performs up to 2% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Memory - 56 vs 55 FPS
- Up to 13% cheaper than Memory - €1269.0 vs €1459.0
- Up to 15% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Memory - €22.66 vs €26.53 per FPS
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
3rd Variation
FPS
55
98.21428571428571%
Value, €/FPS
€26.53/FPS
85.41274029400678%
Price, €
€1459
86%
Buy for €1,459 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 678 minutes ago
Buy for €1,269 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 671 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
3rd Variation
47th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
3rd Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
100%
47th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
3rd Variation
Core i7-12700F
2.1 GHz | 12-core
Single-Core
2362
93.50752177355503%
Multi-Core
11527
85.07638940143184%
47th Variation
Core i7-12700KF
3.6 GHz | 12-core
Single-Core
2526
100%
Multi-Core
13549
100%
CPU Winner
Memory Gaming PC | vs | Megaport PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-12700F | CPU | Core i7-12700KF |
| GeForce RTX 4060 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 480 GB SSD + 1 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |
