Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — EMCA4 outperforms the more expensive Memory on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Performs up to 7% better in Elden Ring than Memory - 87 vs 81 FPS
- Up to 39% cheaper than Memory - €959.00 vs €1569.00
- Up to 43% better value when playing Elden Ring than Memory - €11.02 vs €19.37 per FPS
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for €1,569 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 247 minutes ago
13th Variation
FPS
87
100%
Value, €/FPS
€11.02/FPS
100%
Price, €
€959
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €959 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 246 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
2nd Variation
13th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
2nd Variation
Radeon RX 6700
10 GB GDDR6 | 160-bit
Pixel Fillrate
156.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
352.8 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
13th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
78%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
98%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
2nd Variation
Core i9-12900
2.4 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2473
100%
Multi-Core
13044
100%
CPU Winner
Memory Gaming PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-12900 | CPU | Ryzen 7 5700X |
| Radeon RX 6700 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 480 GB SSD + 1000 GB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |
