Key Differences
In short — EMCA4 outperforms the cheaper Megaport on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Megaport is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Megaport PC
- Up to 47% cheaper than EMCA4 - €879.0 vs €1649.0
- Up to 17% better value when playing World of Tanks than EMCA4 - €5.53 vs €6.68 per FPS
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Performs up to 55% better in World of Tanks than Megaport - 247 vs 159 FPS
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €879 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 827 minutes ago
Buy for €1,649 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 823 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
1st Variation
47th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
1st Variation
GeForce RTX 3060
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
85.3 GPixel/s
72%
Texel Fillrate
199 GTexel/s
84%
47th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
47th Variation
Core i9-14900K
3.2 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
3101
100%
Multi-Core
21000
100%
CPU Winner
Megaport PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i5-10400F | CPU | Core i9-14900K |
| GeForce RTX 3060 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
