Key Differences
In short — Megaport outperforms the cheaper EMCA4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing EMCA4 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Megaport PC
- Performs up to 12% better in Dead Space than EMCA4 - 95 vs 85 FPS
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Up to 19% cheaper than Megaport - €1099.0 vs €1349.0
- Up to 9% better value when playing Dead Space than Megaport - €12.93 vs €14.2 per FPS
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €1,349 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 597 minutes ago
Buy for €1,099 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 595 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
9th Variation
21st Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
9th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
21st Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
76%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
75%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
21st Variation
Ryzen 5 7600
3.8 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2735
100%
Multi-Core
12259
100%
CPU Winner
Megaport PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 7 5800X | CPU | Ryzen 5 7600 |
| GeForce RTX 4070 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
