Key Differences
In short — EMCA4 outperforms Megaport on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Performs up to 31% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Megaport - 310 vs 237 FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Currently Out of Stock
Out of Stock
Updated 1105 minutes ago
13th Variation
FPS
310
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.09/FPS
100%
Price, €
€959
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €959 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1104 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
8th Variation
13th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
8th Variation
GeForce RTX 3060
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
85.3 GPixel/s
70%
Texel Fillrate
199 GTexel/s
58%
13th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
13th Variation
Ryzen 7 5700X
3.4 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2121
100%
Multi-Core
9729
100%
CPU Winner
Megaport PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 5 5500 | CPU | Ryzen 7 5700X |
| GeForce RTX 3060 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 1 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |
