Key Differences
In short — Megaport outperforms the cheaper Megaport on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Megaport is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Megaport PC
- Performs up to 3% better in World of Tanks than Megaport - 185 vs 179 FPS
Advantages of Megaport PC
- Up to 24% cheaper than Megaport - €899.0 vs €1179.0
- Up to 21% better value when playing World of Tanks than Megaport - €5.02 vs €6.37 per FPS
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
6th Variation
FPS
185
100%
Value, €/FPS
€6.37/FPS
78.80690737833595%
Price, €
€1179
76%
FPS Winner
Buy for €1,179 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74724 minutes ago
5th Variation
FPS
179
96.75675675675676%
Value, €/FPS
€5.02/FPS
100%
Price, €
€899
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €899 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74724 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
6th Variation
5th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
6th Variation
GeForce RTX 3060
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
85.3 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
199 GTexel/s
100%
5th Variation
GeForce RTX 3060
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
85.3 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
199 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
6th Variation
Ryzen 7 5800X
3.8 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2178
100%
Multi-Core
10263
100%
CPU Winner
5th Variation
Ryzen 5 5600
3.5 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2029
93.15886134067952%
Multi-Core
8539
83.2017928480951%
Megaport PC | vs | Megaport PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Ryzen 7 5800X | CPU | Ryzen 5 5600 |
GeForce RTX 3060 | GPU | GeForce RTX 3060 |
16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |