Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — EMCA4 outperforms the more expensive Megaport on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Performs up to 9% better in Monster Hunter: World than Megaport - 110 vs 101 FPS
- Up to 25% cheaper than Megaport - €749.0 vs €999.0
- Up to 31% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than Megaport - €6.81 vs €9.89 per FPS
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
51st Variation
FPS
101
91.81818181818183%
Value, €/FPS
€9.89/FPS
68.85743174924166%
Price, €
€999
74%
Buy for €999 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 123 minutes ago
7th Variation
FPS
110
100%
Value, €/FPS
€6.81/FPS
100%
Price, €
€749
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €749 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 272 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
51st Variation
7th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
51st Variation
GeForce RTX 3060
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
85.3 GPixel/s
72.22692633361558%
Texel Fillrate
199 GTexel/s
84.2506350550381%
7th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
51st Variation
Core i7-12700F
2.1 GHz | 12-core
Single-Core
2362
100%
Multi-Core
11527
100%
CPU Winner
7th Variation
Ryzen 5 5600
3.5 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2029
85.9017781541067%
Multi-Core
8539
74.0782510627223%
Megaport PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-12700F | CPU | Ryzen 5 5600 |
| GeForce RTX 3060 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
