Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — EMCA4 outperforms the more expensive Megaport on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Performs up to 17% better in Control than Megaport - 155 vs 132 FPS
- Up to 12% cheaper than Megaport - €1379.0 vs €1559.0
- Up to 25% better value when playing Control than Megaport - €8.9 vs €11.81 per FPS
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
41st Variation
FPS
132
85.16129032258064%
Value, €/FPS
€11.81/FPS
75.35986452159187%
Price, €
€1559
88%
Buy for €1,559 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2742 minutes ago
9th Variation
FPS
155
100%
Value, €/FPS
€8.9/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1379
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,379 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2744 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
41st Variation
9th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
41st Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
75.86206896551724%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
72.70114942528735%
9th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
12 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
208.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
626.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
9th Variation
Ryzen 7 5800X
null-core
Single-Core
2178
86.22327790973871%
Multi-Core
10263
75.74728762270279%
Megaport PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-12700KF | CPU | Ryzen 7 5800X |
| GeForce RTX 4070 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
