Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Gaming outperforms the more expensive Megaport on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Gaming PC
- Performs up to 19% better in The Last of Us Part I than Megaport - 113 vs 95 FPS
- Up to 6% cheaper than Megaport - €1779.0 vs €1899.0
- Up to 21% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Megaport - €15.74 vs €19.99 per FPS
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
36th Variation
FPS
95
84.070796460177%
Value, €/FPS
€19.99/FPS
78.73936968484243%
Price, €
€1899
93%
Buy for €1,899 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74323 minutes ago
Buy for €1,779 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74328 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
36th Variation
44th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
36th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
198 GPixel/s
43.08093994778068%
Texel Fillrate
554.4 GTexel/s
68.92093485827945%
44th Variation
Radeon RX 7900 XT
20 GB GDDR6 | 320-bit
Pixel Fillrate
459.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
804.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
36th Variation
Core i7-14700KF
3.4 GHz | 20-core
Single-Core
2975
100%
Multi-Core
19234
100%
CPU Winner
44th Variation
Ryzen 9 7900
3.7 GHz | 12-core
Single-Core
2824
94.92436974789916%
Multi-Core
16743
87.04897577207029%
Megaport PC | vs | Gaming PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Core i7-14700KF | CPU | Ryzen 9 7900 |
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | GPU | Radeon RX 7900 XT |
16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |