Key Differences
In short — Megaport outperforms EMCA4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of Megaport PC
- Performs up to 18% better in Starfield than EMCA4 - 72 vs 61 FPS
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Currently Out of Stock
Out of Stock
Updated 350 minutes ago
Buy for €1,579 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
33rd Variation
52nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
33rd Variation
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
285.6 GPixel/s
62%
Texel Fillrate
816 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
52nd Variation
Radeon RX 7900 XT
20 GB GDDR6 | 320-bit
Pixel Fillrate
459.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
804.4 GTexel/s
99%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
33rd Variation
Ryzen 7 7700
3.8 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2854
100%
Multi-Core
14808
100%
CPU Winner
Megaport PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Ryzen 7 7700 | CPU | Core i7-12700F |
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER | GPU | Radeon RX 7900 XT |
16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |