Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Megaport outperforms the more expensive Megaport on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Megaport PC
- Performs up to 9% better in World of Warcraft than Megaport - 150 vs 137 FPS
- Up to 6% cheaper than Megaport - €849.0 vs €899.0
- Up to 14% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Megaport - €5.66 vs €6.56 per FPS
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
29th Variation
FPS
137
91.33333333333333%
Value, €/FPS
€6.56/FPS
86.28048780487806%
Price, €
€899
94%
Buy for €899 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 437 minutes ago
Buy for €849 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 433 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
29th Variation
44th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
29th Variation
GeForce RTX 3050
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
56.86 GPixel/s
66.6588511137163%
Texel Fillrate
142.2 GTexel/s
71.4572864321608%
44th Variation
GeForce RTX 3060
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
85.3 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
199 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
29th Variation
Core i5-12400F
2.5 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2191
100%
Multi-Core
8910
91.58186864014802%
CPU Winner
44th Variation
Ryzen 7 5700X
3.4 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2121
96.80511182108627%
Multi-Core
9729
100%
Megaport PC | vs | Megaport PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i5-12400F | CPU | Ryzen 7 5700X |
| GeForce RTX 3050 | GPU | GeForce RTX 3060 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
