Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — EMCA4 outperforms the more expensive Megaport on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Performs up to 37% better in World of Tanks than Megaport - 207 vs 151 FPS
- Up to 8% cheaper than Megaport - €829.0 vs €899.0
- Up to 33% better value when playing World of Tanks than Megaport - €4.0 vs €5.95 per FPS
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
29th Variation
FPS
151
72.94685990338165%
Value, €/FPS
€5.95/FPS
67.22689075630251%
Price, €
€899
92%
Buy for €899 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 303 minutes ago
22nd Variation
FPS
207
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4/FPS
100%
Price, €
€829
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €829 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 304 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
29th Variation
22nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
29th Variation
GeForce RTX 3050
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
56.86 GPixel/s
48.14563928873836%
Texel Fillrate
142.2 GTexel/s
60.20321761219305%
22nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
29th Variation
Core i5-12400F
2.5 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2191
100%
Multi-Core
8910
100%
CPU Winner
22nd Variation
Ryzen 5 5600X
3.7 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2092
95.481515289822%
Multi-Core
8659
97.18294051627385%
Megaport PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i5-12400F | CPU | Ryzen 5 5600X |
| GeForce RTX 3050 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
