Key Differences
In short — Megaport outperforms the cheaper EMCA4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing EMCA4 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Megaport PC
- Performs up to 52% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than EMCA4 - 150 vs 99 FPS
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Up to 52% cheaper than Megaport - €869.00 vs €1829.00
- Up to 28% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Megaport - €8.78 vs €12.19 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €1,829 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 810 minutes ago
Buy for €869 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 807 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
27th Variation
55th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
27th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
55th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
75%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
52%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
27th Variation
Ryzen 7 7700X
4.5 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2908
100%
Multi-Core
15263
100%
CPU Winner
55th Variation
Core i5-12600KF
3.7 GHz | 10-core
Single-Core
2472
85%
Multi-Core
12036
79%
Megaport PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 7 7700X | CPU | Core i5-12600KF |
| GeForce RTX 4070 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
