Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Megaport outperforms the cheaper Megaport on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Megaport PC
- Performs up to 102% better in World of Tanks than Megaport - 374 vs 185 FPS
- Up to 41% better value when playing World of Tanks than Megaport - €3.79 vs €6.37 per FPS
Advantages of Megaport PC
- Up to 17% cheaper than Megaport - €1179.0 vs €1419.0
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €1,419 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 597 minutes ago
6th Variation
FPS
185
49.465240641711226%
Value, €/FPS
€6.37/FPS
59.49764521193093%
Price, €
€1179
100%
Buy for €1,179 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 598 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
25th Variation
6th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
25th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
208.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
626.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
6th Variation
GeForce RTX 3060
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
85.3 GPixel/s
40.85249042145593%
Texel Fillrate
199 GTexel/s
31.768837803320565%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
25th Variation
Ryzen 7 5700X
3.4 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2121
97.38292011019284%
Multi-Core
9729
94.79684302835429%
6th Variation
Ryzen 7 5800X
3.8 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2178
100%
Multi-Core
10263
100%
CPU Winner
Megaport PC | vs | Megaport PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 7 5700X | CPU | Ryzen 7 5800X |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | GPU | GeForce RTX 3060 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
