Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Megaport outperforms the more expensive EMCA4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Megaport PC
- Performs up to 62% better in F1 22 than EMCA4 - 221 vs 136 FPS
- Up to 15% cheaper than EMCA4 - €1399.0 vs €1649.0
- Up to 48% better value when playing F1 22 than EMCA4 - €6.33 vs €12.12 per FPS
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €1,399 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75114 minutes ago
47th Variation
FPS
136
61.53846153846154%
Value, €/FPS
€12.12/FPS
52.22772277227723%
Price, €
€1649
84%
Buy for €1,649 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75106 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
25th Variation
47th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
25th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
208.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
626.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
47th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
56.56130268199233%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
37.70753512132822%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
25th Variation
Ryzen 7 5700X
3.4 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2121
68.39729119638827%
Multi-Core
9729
46.32857142857143%
47th Variation
Core i9-14900K
3.2 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
3101
100%
Multi-Core
21000
100%
CPU Winner
Megaport PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Ryzen 7 5700X | CPU | Core i9-14900K |
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |