Key Differences
In short — Megaport outperforms the cheaper EMCA4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing EMCA4 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Megaport PC
- Performs up to 21% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than EMCA4 - 69 vs 57 FPS
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Up to 23% cheaper than Megaport - €999.0 vs €1299.0
- Up to 7% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Megaport - €17.53 vs €18.83 per FPS
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €1,299 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 794 minutes ago
Buy for €999 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 794 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
23rd Variation
12th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
23rd Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
16 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
12th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
97%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
68%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
12th Variation
Ryzen 5 7600
3.8 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2735
100%
Multi-Core
12259
83%
CPU Winner
Megaport PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-13700 | CPU | Ryzen 5 7600 |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
