Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Megaport outperforms the cheaper Megaport on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Megaport PC
- Performs up to 23% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Megaport - 70 vs 57 FPS
- Up to 12% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Megaport - €13.13 vs €14.89 per FPS
Advantages of Megaport PC
- Up to 8% cheaper than Megaport - €849.0 vs €919.0
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €919 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 259 minutes ago
44th Variation
FPS
57
81.42857142857143%
Value, €/FPS
€14.89/FPS
88.17998656816656%
Price, €
€849
100%
Buy for €849 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 254 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
11th Variation
44th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
11th Variation
Radeon RX 7600
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
169.9 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
339.8 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
44th Variation
GeForce RTX 3060
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
85.3 GPixel/s
50.20600353148911%
Texel Fillrate
199 GTexel/s
58.56386109476163%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
11th Variation
Ryzen 5 5600G
3.9 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
1918
90.42904290429043%
Multi-Core
7665
78.78507554733272%
44th Variation
Ryzen 7 5700X
3.4 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2121
100%
Multi-Core
9729
100%
CPU Winner
Megaport PC | vs | Megaport PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 5 5600G | CPU | Ryzen 7 5700X |
| Radeon RX 7600 | GPU | GeForce RTX 3060 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
