Key Differences
In short — Megaport iCUE outperforms the cheaper EMCA4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing EMCA4 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Megaport iCUE PC
- Performs up to 43% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than EMCA4 - 163 vs 114 FPS
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Up to 47% cheaper than Megaport iCUE - €2179.0 vs €4099.0
- Up to 24% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Megaport iCUE - €19.11 vs €25.15 per FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
1st Variation
FPS
163
100%
Value, €/FPS
€25.15/FPS
75.98409542743539%
Price, €
€4099
53%
FPS Winner
Buy for €4,099 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74362 minutes ago
53rd Variation
FPS
114
69.93865030674846%
Value, €/FPS
€19.11/FPS
100%
Price, €
€2179
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €2,179 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74353 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
1st Variation
53rd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
1st Variation
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
53rd Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
250.6 GPixel/s
56.50507328072153%
Texel Fillrate
689 GTexel/s
53.41085271317829%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
1st Variation
Core i9-13900K
3.0 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
2974
95.90454692034828%
Multi-Core
20148
95.94285714285714%
53rd Variation
Core i9-14900K
3.2 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
3101
100%
Multi-Core
21000
100%
CPU Winner
Megaport iCUE PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-13900K | CPU | Core i9-14900K |
| GeForce RTX 4090 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
64 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
