Key Differences
In short — Megaport iCUE outperforms the cheaper EMCA4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing EMCA4 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Megaport iCUE PC
- Performs up to 341% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than EMCA4 - 163 vs 37 FPS
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Up to 78% cheaper than Megaport iCUE - €899.0 vs €4099.0
- Up to 3% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Megaport iCUE - €24.3 vs €25.15 per FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for €4,099 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 776 minutes ago
Buy for €899 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1935 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
1st Variation
14th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
1st Variation
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
14th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
27%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
26%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
1st Variation
Core i9-13900K
3.0 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
2974
100%
Multi-Core
20148
100%
CPU Winner
Megaport iCUE PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-13900K | CPU | Ryzen 5 5500 |
| GeForce RTX 4090 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB |
64 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
