Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Megaport outperforms the more expensive Megaport Completo on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Megaport PC
- Performs up to 29% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Megaport Completo - 147 vs 114 FPS
- Up to 10% cheaper than Megaport Completo - €1219.0 vs €1349.0
- Up to 30% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Megaport Completo - €8.29 vs €11.83 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
12th Variation
FPS
114
77.55102040816327%
Value, €/FPS
€11.83/FPS
70.07607776838546%
Price, €
€1349
90%
Buy for €1,349 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2672 minutes ago
Buy for €1,219 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2673 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
12th Variation
35th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
12th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
61.464646464646464%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
62.1933621933622%
35th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
12 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
198 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
554.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
12th Variation
Core i7-12700F
null-core
Single-Core
2362
100%
Multi-Core
11527
100%
CPU Winner
35th Variation
Ryzen 7 5700X
null-core
Single-Core
2121
89.79678238780694%
Multi-Core
9729
84.4018391602325%
Megaport Completo PC | vs | Megaport PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Core i7-12700F | CPU | Ryzen 7 5700X |
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |