The MEDION ERAZER Engineer E10 is at least 2x slower gaming PC Build than the EMCA4. We cannot compare value as at least one PC Build is out of stock.
Advantages of the MEDION ERAZER Engineer E10 Gaming PC
The EMCA4 Computer PC is better in every way
Advantages of the EMCA4 Computer PC
- At least 2x faster PC Build for gaming
MEDION ERAZER Engineer E10 vs EMCA4 for Gaming
The PC's performance in selected game and settings
MEDION ERAZER Engineer E10 Gaming PC
1st Variation
Average FPS
44
25%
Min 1% FPS
19
17%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
EMCA4 Computer PC
52nd Variation
Average FPS
177
100%
Min 1% FPS
112
100%
Price, €
€1579
100%
Value, €/FPS
€8.92/FPS
100%
My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
MEDION ERAZER Engineer E10 Gaming PC
1st Variation
GeForce GTX 1650
4 GB GDDR5 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
12%
Texture Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
12%
FP32
2.984 TFLOPS
6%
EMCA4 Computer PC
52nd Variation
Radeon RX 7900 XT
20 GB GDDR6 | 320-bit
Pixel Fillrate
459.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
804.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
51.48 TFLOPS
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 6 benchmark scores
MEDION ERAZER Engineer E10 Gaming PC
1st Variation
Core i5-12400
2.5 GHz | 6-core
Geekbench 6 Single-Core
2207
92%
Geekbench 6 Multi-Core
8857
75%
EMCA4 Computer PC
52nd Variation
Core i7-12700F
2.1 GHz | 12-core
Geekbench 6 Single-Core
2402
100%
Geekbench 6 Multi-Core
11831
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
MEDION ERAZER Engineer E10 Gaming PC | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | EMCA4 Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i5-12400 | CPU | Core i7-12700F |
| GeForce GTX 1650 | GPU | Radeon RX 7900 XT |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 512 GB | SSD | - |
| - | HDD | - |
