Key Differences
In short — Golook outperforms the cheaper EMCA4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing EMCA4 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Golook PC
- Performs up to 48% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than EMCA4 - 152 vs 103 FPS
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Up to 40% cheaper than Golook - €899.0 vs €1499.0
- Up to 11% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Golook - €8.73 vs €9.86 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €1,499 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77002 minutes ago
Buy for €899 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 314 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
4th Variation
14th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
4th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
198 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
554.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
14th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
61%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
62%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
4th Variation
Core i9-11900KF
3.5 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2317
100%
Multi-Core
10125
100%
CPU Winner
Golook PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-11900KF | CPU | Ryzen 5 5500 |
| GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | N/A Storage |
