Key Differences
In short — Sedatech outperforms the cheaper Gaming on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Gaming is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Gaming PC
- Up to 29% cheaper than Sedatech - €3399.0 vs €4769.9
- Up to 27% better value when playing Starfield than Sedatech - €39.99 vs €54.83 per FPS
Advantages of Sedatech PC
- Performs up to 2% better in Starfield than Gaming - 87 vs 85 FPS
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
1st Variation
FPS
85
97.70114942528735%
Value, €/FPS
€39.99/FPS
100%
Price, €
€3399
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €3,399 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77762 minutes ago
4th Variation
FPS
87
100%
Value, €/FPS
€54.83/FPS
72.93452489513041%
Price, €
€4769.9
71%
FPS Winner
Buy for €4,769.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77748 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
1st Variation
4th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
1st Variation
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
4th Variation
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
1st Variation
Core i9-13900K
3.0 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
2974
95.68854568854569%
Multi-Core
20148
95.75135443398916%
4th Variation
Core i9-14900KF
3.2 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
3108
100%
Multi-Core
21042
100%
CPU Winner
Gaming PC | vs | Sedatech PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Core i9-13900K | CPU | Core i9-14900KF |
GeForce RTX 4090 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4090 |
64 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
N/A Storage | Storage | 4 TB SSD |