Key Differences
In short — Gaming outperforms the cheaper EMCA4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing EMCA4 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Gaming PC
- Performs up to 1% better in No Man's Sky than EMCA4 - 214 vs 212 FPS
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Up to 26% cheaper than Gaming - €2499.0 vs €3399.0
- Up to 26% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Gaming - €11.79 vs €15.88 per FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €3,399 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7402 minutes ago
Buy for €2,499 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7400 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
1st Variation
17th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
1st Variation
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
92%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
17th Variation
Radeon RX 7900 XTX
24 GB GDDR6 | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
479.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
959.6 GTexel/s
74%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
1st Variation
Core i9-13900K
3.0 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
2974
100%
Multi-Core
20148
100%
CPU Winner
17th Variation
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
4.2 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2918
98%
Multi-Core
19633
97%
Gaming PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-13900K | CPU | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
| GeForce RTX 4090 | GPU | Radeon RX 7900 XTX |
64 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
