Key Differences
In short — Gaming outperforms the cheaper EMCA4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing EMCA4 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Gaming PC
- Performs up to 85% better in Battlefield V than EMCA4 - 241 vs 130 FPS
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Up to 60% cheaper than Gaming - €799.0 vs €1979.0
- Up to 25% better value when playing Battlefield V than Gaming - €6.15 vs €8.21 per FPS
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €1,979 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 534598 minutes ago
48th Variation
FPS
130
53.941908713692946%
Value, €/FPS
€6.15/FPS
100%
Price, €
€799
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €799 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74381 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
9th Variation
48th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
9th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
208.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
626.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
48th Variation
GeForce RTX 3060
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
85.3 GPixel/s
40.85249042145593%
Texel Fillrate
199 GTexel/s
31.768837803320565%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
9th Variation
Core i9-12900K
3.2 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2620
100%
Multi-Core
15445
100%
CPU Winner
48th Variation
Ryzen 7 5700X
3.4 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2121
80.95419847328245%
Multi-Core
9729
62.99125930721916%
Gaming PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-12900K | CPU | Ryzen 7 5700X |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | GPU | GeForce RTX 3060 |
64 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
